Thursday, January 22, 2015

So, reality being what it is, it has left its mark on me. Not being one to give up easily, I dusted myself off and chose to believe that the tire track on my back is a fashion statement.

I gave up, again, on technology to keep my life organized. I've surrendered to the ravages of time and now accept that the current concept of modern technology is insufficient for me to keep my life organized.

My phone is *gasp* a telephone first an a clever tool after that. The software that I used to keep the phone synchronized with my computer is long past the point of end of life and no longer usable. Add to that the uniquely humorous adventure of a short attention span and I know that technology has not figured out what I need to do in order to survive so out came my old Day-Runner organizer and I dusted it off. Yes, paper. No spiffy high-tech doodad du jour to keep my life organized until it all changes six months later when the newest version of "their" software comes out.

Before you laugh, let me tell you this. I heard a really neat presentation of an idea on NPR one day and it applies here. The speaker pointed out that not that long ago there was this clever thing called a "Betamax" video tape. You can't view them anymore. It's not even an extremely old technology, it is just gone by the wayside. However, you can still read a Gutenberg bible that was printed in what, the 1500's. So don't laugh. Just because you don't think it's a technologically "smart" decision, I counter with that its the smartest decision that could be made.

So, paper. Let's talk about this. I'm not the only one of course. Tom Limoncelli, the wunderkind behind has termed his paper organizer his "PAA" for Personal Analog Assistant has a lot of interesting resources for those of us who want to survive our own lives. There's also "D*I*Y Planner" at They seem to have gone by the wayside but there's still a lot of cool stuff you can find there. Its a shame because there seemed to be some really brilliant things going on there.

One of the things I'd found is the DIYPlanner Widget kit and I designed some of my own pages. Once you make an effort it's very easy to do.

So, the first thing I did was create a ToDo list for myself. I took one that I found and I massaged it to my own liking. After that I got this:

It worked pretty well but I found that the spacing was too small and the list got to be too large. So, redesign again. This time I spaced it out a good bit more and got rid of the check boxes. Now I have:

This works nice. So, now I printed it onto different colored papers. Based on what I had available to me I used a buff color (super pale yellow) for my work list and a nice light blue one for personal things. It's working aces and I'm pretty happy with it.

I still have a list of name and phone number pairs in a spreadsheet that I should set as one list based on a classification... Hmmm... That means that maybe I can come up with a page for that. So, I created a blank "Classified" page based on one of the pages that I got with my Day Runner when I got it. So, here's what I did. I created a blank page:

So, I take that and I run it through the printer on a piece of bright yellow thick paper, sort of like a soft cardboard and then I print my little address list on it by running it through the printer again and I get a nice solid "Classified" page for, in the first case, the local restaurants we always visit! Feeling clever, I do the same thing on a piece of orange paper of the same type and print the local emergency services numbers on it.

Then I had to come up with a note pad. I used to have a "top-glued" three hole punched (register size) note pad that I used all the time. Well, I can't find them so I created a similar one and printed them on pink paper.

Now I use these for "incoming" things that I haven't classified yet or developed a plan for. This is just where I scribble down my thoughts then during the review process I'll transcribe what is there and tear out the page and it's gone.

Yes, I'm still reading the GTD book but it's taking time.

Oh, in playing with the ideas, I did a goofy test to see if I could create one of those really "classy" looking pages that some folks create. In doing it, I came up with this:

So, that's it for my experiments now. If I come up with more things I'll try to post them here.

Questions or opinions welcome!

Wednesday, October 8, 2014

Abundance of power cords.

I had an idea recently. I tried to reach out to a couple of the manufacturers of power strips and got told something along the lines of "We'll be glad to take your idea and make oodles of money from it but we won't even bother sending you a holiday card for thanks." Call me cynical but I don't believe that there should be no rewards for good ideas. So, instead of giving it to companies to make a profit from, I post it here in the hopes that others can use this small idea and not lay claim to it. (Oct 2014)

Like most folks I have an overabundance of those C13 power cords laying around the house.

I also have more than my fair share of power strips in collections of boxes that need to be weeded out. I suspect that already a small percentage of anyone who reads this has already made the leap I'd made.

Why don't these power strips accept the C13 connector and eliminate having to supply a cable? It'll also give us a place to use those C13 cables that we all seem to have too many of.

No doubt there's someone who'll suggest that it's done in an effort to "protect the consumer" (which is another quagmire that I don't want to dive into here).

So, maybe, just maybe by posting it here it'll be of use to some home hobby hacker or such. Just not to large corps who run with someone else's idea.

Friday, July 4, 2014

My adventures on the Medicare website.

Yes, I'm going to rant. I was trying to find something medical related and to do so required that I find a supplier for this particular item. (Actually I wanted to change suppliers.)

So, first step, type a query into Google and see what pops up.

Ah! Great, the US Government's website for Medicare has a list of "approved" suppliers. Let's click on that. After all it says: ' A federal government website managed by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services'

The first thing it says is this:

The page could not be loaded. The Home page currently does not fully support browsers with "JavaScript" disabled. Please note that if you choose to continue without enabling "JavaScript" certain functionalities on this website may not be available.

WTF? Let me see if I can understand what it says. "We don't support the *basic* RUDIMENTARY functions of a browser, we only support the more "advanced", security riddled, vendor specific and overly complex functions requiring JavaScript. Huh? What the hell do you mean you don't support browsers without JavaScript? How do you design a webpage to not support the most basic functionality? Good thing no one that comes to "" is disabled in any way. I bet the speech systems make a big difference with JS.

Okay, let's see what crap isn't permitted....

Okay,, don't know who you are so you're not getting through. Ah, and Not too sure but I'll permit those scripts. Then we'll see what happens.

Ah good, we get through without a warning. Let's see if I can find what I need now. Way down the bottom, "Where to get covered medical items." Good, let's click on that. Not bad, now it needs my zip code. I do so and click "Go" and this is what's left....

That's all she wrote. So, let's see NOW what scripts are disabled. (Because needing to use Javascript to draw a little whirly thing is so important.)

Seriously? You can't tend to your customer's needs without "" Really? The company you sued in federal court for anti-trust violations? Hmmm...  Our tax dollar at work. Great. So, let's see what else we can discover about this.

Don't know who (or what) is so they're not getting through. I'll relax my rules enough to let through and see what else happens. Nada. Okay, let's try letting through the

Seriously? It STILL doesn't work? Let's see who we need to let through *now*. Okay, google again. Prefer not to but I'll risk it.

Chartbeat? Eff-off, don't care that you want to keep track. mxpnl? Still no, nor Macro$lop. I don't trust you. Let's turn on the last google request.

Done. Now let's see what happens... *YAWN* Still nothing. Tick...Tock...Tick...Tock... Nope, still nothing.

So "", you mean to tell me that you can't do what your average high-school student can do and design a website that provides even the most rudimentary *information* to your constituents? Really?

Wow, I need to get a job there. Imagine being able to be this bad and keep your job? Oh, and BTW, while I've been doing all this (writing and taking screen shots) I've had an Opera browser running on the *FIRST* page and it still hasn't responded. :)

I see a little thing down the bottom of my current FireFox screen that says "Helpful Links" and a subtopic "Site policies & important links" that takes us to "" which is the "Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services" Okay, so let's see what they have to say...

There's a link for "Accessibility and Compliance with Section 508" let's see what that says. Hmmm.. More humor of the Dilbert kind.

Unless doing so would impose an undue burden on the agency. Wow. Talk about a skewed reality. You can't provide the information in the most basic form and that's an "undue burden"? So you force the populous to sacrifice security? Wow.

Okay, let's be reasonable, I'll read on and see what I find. Oh! A link that might help "Policy for Linking to Outside Websites" Yes, that will help! It says:

Wow. What a crock. Why the heck do you need to involve Macro$lop in my search for medical supplies? Please explain that because I don't see ONE item on that bulleted list that matches up with that need.

Okay, let's read on...

It also says:
Hmmm.... Where's that... Nope, can't find ANY link with that title. So, that's useless but I do find an interesting tidbit on the end of that notification "CMS disclaims responsibility for the content and privacy policies of websites." Wow. Really? You mean you're going to compel me to permit these third party, non ".gov" website/businesses into my computer or you're not going to service me? Great idea. Just freakin' spiffy.

Wednesday, April 23, 2014

A thought on privacy and/verses security.

I had a conversation recently and one of the questions posed to everyone was one of those commonly asked questions and I thought I'd expand on my response.

The question was "What do you worry about when it comes to security?"

My response got the attention of the folks at the table and that response was "You."

There's two weak spots in "my security" chain-mail. The first one is the information that is in the hands of people I know. I'm sure you're already saying "Huh?" to this. Let me give you an example. Most of my friends know, by random conversations that my mother's maiden name is Logan. (Yes, like the airport and there's even a chance we're related. Ok, I may also stand as much of a chance of hitting the lottery but that's a digression for another time.)

So, right there is a chink in my security armor because if one of my friends mentions this fact in "the wrong circles", one of my so-called "Security questions" suddenly has no value and that hurdle for a "bad guy" to get through in order to "become me".

Because of the erroneous dependency on this sort of information, the "imperiousness" of that chain-mail security net has a number of weakened links.

So that's one of the two problems. The other one is the companies that get my private information. Not the first level recipients of this information, my doctor, dentist, electric company, etc. the ones I'm worried about are the second and tertiary level entities who are able to get their hands on this information. Every layer/step away from me, the originator of the information, is weaker than the one before it and that worries me. Every time we/I'm required to give my personal information out we/I'm also give permission to the primary recipient of this information to use this information and they "give us" their rules of behavior by which they will handle my information. At no time are we/I given any rules or power about these secondary recipients of this information. So, just like previously stated example, every step/layer away from the primary source of information (me) the thinner the wall of security surrounding it.

And the other part of the concept of security is the idea/illusion/belief of punitive responses to compromises of this security. If someone "in my circle" discloses sensitive information, I have *some* recourse to offset any losses I suffer because of this. Additionally, if one of these primary companies does something stupid, I have *some* recourse for compensation but if one of *their* "vendors" who gets this information does something stupid, I'm "S-O-L" and I might as well sit back and watch my life swirl around the bowl because there's nothing I can do about it.

Wednesday, August 1, 2012

Brick & Mortar shops are safe.

If anyone tells you that "Brick and Mortar" shopping is a thing of the past you can point them to this screen shot I got when visiting "Onecall" (got it multiple times too...).

I happened on their site and clicked on the "Best Deals of the Week" banner, and chose "Camcorder" to see what options I might have.

Let's see what the system found for me.....
  1. A panasonic shaver.... Don't know how that'll work.
  2. A "Personal Utility Cart". Damn, I hope the camcorder I get won't need a personal utility cart to use it.
  3. Ah, how about a $200 saute pan. Hmmm... A bit clumsy when visiting Disney.

Why will brick & mortar businesses never completely fail? Because they don't waste our time!

Saturday, February 11, 2012

Product test review for LG BD670 Blueray Player

Unsolicited product test review.

Subject: LG BD670 Blueray Player review.

    LG - BD670 Blueray Player

Manufacturer: LG
Model: BD670
Product cost: $109.00
Would you recommend the product to your friends: (Yes or No) No, I'd warn people away from this unit.
What attracted you to this product: Cost/Manufacturer
What is it's best feature: Size.
What is it's worst feature: High-pitched noise from it.
Support (or lack thereof.)

    Rate it using the terms "Excellent"; "Good"; "Fair"; "Poor"; "Unknown"; or "N/A" for not applicable; in the areas of:
      Performance: Good
      Quality: Good
      Design: Poor
      Ease of Use: Poor
      Durability: Unknown
      Size: Good
      Versatility: Poor
      Power: N/A
      Rated against similar products: Unknown
      Overall rating: Poor

My Comments and Opinions:
  1. The reports found on the web about the high-pitched noise from this unit are accurate. Don't know exactly what it is but I'm sure it's a motor of some sort, maybe a fan. Don't know.
  2. The "Apps" they crow about are horrible, most of them are repackaged movies of highly questionable value. The other thing is the "Apps" that aren't movies seem to be geared to children or niche markets, and trying to dig through the pile of this to find anything interesting is just too much work to be worth it.
  3. Oh yea. When I turn it on and go to the "Premium Apps" "App", I keep getting that there's access for it in my country. Just stupid.
  4. Wait until you have to enter a username/password on the screen using the cursor buttons on the remote! That'll drive you bonkers inside the first five minutes. (The "Auto Login" function doesn't seem to work reliably either.)
  5. Another thing seems to be really poor buffering. It's not unusual to be streaming a movie on my local network only to have it lock up for an indordinatly long time with no indication that it's trying to get the data then to have the audio/video out of sync. The other thing I find amusing when this happens is that the movie attempts to catch up to itself. The movie, once enough data hits the machine the movie runs in "fast forward" style catch up. You'll find that sort of thing listed under "bad engineering".

Tuesday, January 24, 2012

Cheap NAS at home.... The saga...

For those that have read my previous postings about the Coolmax CN-330 and are looking for those posts, forget it. I've taken them down. Why?
  • 2012-January:
    Another update. I called them after hunting around for a number and I got the same basic crap. "Tough Luck", they'd be willing to sell me a fan but they won't make good on the ones that have failed. When I asked for the name of the person in charge, the guy told me "There's no need for that." and then hung up on me.
  • 2012-January:
    Well, I am sorry to say that I'm now compelled to report that I've had yet another fan die on this product, that makes for a total of four fans since I got this unit in July of 2010. Way too many for anyone to say that it's a fluke.

My most recent exchange with them "ended" with their statement:
Basing on the date, is 2010. This unit comes with 1 year warranty only.

Yes, that's the dumbest thing any company could say to a customer.

Why? Dunno.

The long and short of it is, I can not recomend this product in the slightest. Yea it's slow but it was cheap. The problem is, coolmax fans are pieces of crap. I've now done some poking around the net and I've found that there's a lot of folks complaining about the fans on the power supplies (and this NAS) and subsequently complaining about the crappy support. So.... Move on, time to find a new toy. It just occurred to me, here's a product review I did:
Unsolicited product test review.

Subject: Coolmax CN-330 NAS (Network Attached Storage)

Manufacturer: Coolmax
Model: CN-330
How much: US$100
Would you recommend the product to your friends: (Yes or No) No, never.
What attracted you to this product: Simplicity. DIY. Cost. Features.
What is it's best feature: Simplicity. Not feature laden.
What is it's worst feature: Toss up between the lousy fans that constantly fail or the support organization that doesn't answer emails or even care about the customer.
If you were in charge, how would you improve it: There's many ways but they don't pay me for this.

Rate it using the terms "Excellent"; "Good"; "Fair"; "Poor"; or "N/A" for not applicable; in the areas of:
Performance: Fair
Quality: Fair
Design: Poor
Ease of Use: Fair
Durability: Poor
Size: Good
Versatility: Poor
Power: Good
Rated against similar products: Poor
Overall rating: Poor

My Comments and Opinions:

I think I've made my opinions clear now.